Canadian Minister of the Status of Women Lies

Home | News articles 2000+ | Legal advice | Links | Site search | Contents | Archive | Solicitors

Parent protest group campaigning for parents rights securing justice and equality in welsh family courts

 

Canadian Minister of The Status of Women Lies

www.fathers.ca 27 March 2005

Political Commentary and Option The Minister of The Status of Women has Claimed on the Don Cherry comment and demanded the CBC take action against him: Jean Augustine stated and according to in a new report; 'Reuters News Service

Jean Augustine, minister of state for multiculturalism, later told reporters that "the government will not tolerate statements that create dissonance in our society and disrespect for others."" She and Coderre demanded that the CBC take action. "

When you have the Liberal government officials claiming that will not tolerate statements that create dissonance in our society and disrespect for others.......... Then those same Government Officials like "Jean Augustine, minister of state for multiculturalism, and the status of women minister" supporting and promoting this trashy report that promotes hate on the male gender "School Success by Gender: A Catalyst for the Masculinist Discourse" then she must be fired from her job at once.

"We can not have in Canada, government officials holding government positions in office, "that are promoting and creating dissonance in our society and disrespect for others... ("men and fathers, and boys") they must stop promoting criminal activity by radical feminist groups, that dislike the family unit...and the MALE GENDER.

Sheila Copps and many other Liberals also supported the hate report on Fathers and their websites.

Based on the hate report School Success by Gender: A Catalyst for the Masculinist Discourse - FATHERS RIGHTS  GROUPS WORLD WIDE ARE UNDER ATTACK BY RADICAL MILITANT FEMINIST FOR SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THE ABUSES AND THE DANGERS FATHERS FACE IN SOCIETY.

Slander Suit based on the report listed above.

UPDATE, The feminist from Laval had hope to have this case heard before the courts in Montréal, they lost in the jurisdiction hearing in the BC Courts. What they had tried to use was the Montreal Mark Lepine Killing as a emotional legal argument, not based on law.

This case will go forward as the ruling stands states this case will be heard in British Columbia Supreme Court in Victoria. See the Case Judgement.

n their Government report, they call for fathers rights groups to be monitored and criminally charged as well as stating they are hate mongers, pornographers and pedophiles.  It seems they are going to extremism to justify their hate crimes on men, fathers and boys based on lies and outright stupidity, by making these false claims they use to justify the self serving goals.

Also see Richard Warman a lawyer with the Human Rights Case trying and doing the same thing as the Status of Women supported by the Heritage Ministry in Canada

These type of Radical feminists, however, while embracing this mainstream goal--even hiding behind it--go much further: They seek to undermine the nuclear family of married father, mother, and children, which they label the "patriarchal family." As feminist leader Betty Friedan has warned, this anti-marriage agenda places radical feminists profoundly at odds with the family aspirations of mainstream feminists and most other American women.

What is interesting in their report, is these types of "RADICAL MILITANT FEMINIST" use one man name "Mark Lepine" and the killings in Montréal, and every year on December 6th, to justify there hate report on men, fathers, and to gain either sympathy from the courts and/or others in the public, to make it out as they all are some kind of victims based on a horrible tragedy....

The one question that comes to mind is that it still doesn't justify their slander on men, fathers in their hate report they produced and funded by the Federal Liberal Government using tax payers money. It's only a red herring that will seek to further undermined all men and fathers of their god given rights to be equal under the laws of the land...

Instead as it is now, fathers are becoming second class citizen's with no rights to their children while these militant feminist violate the equality laws in this country to further their sexist and bigoted goals. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms demands that all people are equal under the laws, and no less..  But Every year the Government of Canada and their Legislation, is making fathers a dirty word and a crime to be born in the male gender status.

As for the result of Mark Lepine insane shooting: 14 women murdered, 9 women and 4 men injured. You will note nothing is ever said about those men who were injured, by the media or the feminist themselves. So ask yourself why is that.

We all know, "that is people" who have common sense and are not sexist for political correct agenda's, that Violence is not a gender issue, it's a social issue and you can't find solutions to violence, if it's only treated as a women's issue only. After all, that would be like saying ["do not women kill children every year, or commit violent abuses on children and men"] and maybe there should be statues erected to show every year of those deaths, and note, no one is saying that men are not violent, but the way these Radical militant feminist would have you believe this issue of violence, only men are the ones who are violent, and all women are victims.  

"Violence is not a gender issue", as both men and women commit violence in society. http://www.fathers.ca/studies_1.htm

But According to Pierrette Bouchard's legal view she taking and where she says:  in legal court  documents, which are public records for anyone to view, she states and quotes;

["I refer to the multiple murders that were committed in 1989 at the École Poly technique de Montreal; a number of women, who had been designated as feminists by the murderer Marc Lepine, were chosen as targets in an event that received extensive media coverage, even outside of Quebec and Canada."] and further states ["the French-language letter left by Marc Lepine in order to justify his behaviour, along with a translation thereof. This letter was published in its entirety by the media, including the Montreal newspaper La Presse, and as such was circulated throughout Quebec."]

You have to ask yourself why would these radical militant feminist go to such lengths to justify their hate on men, fathers and boys.. Are men, fathers to be blamed for everything that goes wrong with the Radical Feminist movement, because they believe only they have rights and freedoms in this country, and only they are permitted to speak out!.

Instead these radical militant feminist seek to say all men are the "Mark Lepine's of this world" and say that all men are capable of such behavior only while they the feminist keep on lying about women's violence on men and children, Note how they and many others ignore women's violence including on children.  Are we to believe as men, fathers, to feel guilty for acts committed by one man, that has no barring on being of the male gender, because the feminist which to keep right on with their sexist and bigoted lies.

Men and Fathers are not responsible for responsible for the actions of  Mark Lepine's.

Common Sense would tell people, this would be insane thinking, that all men are responsible for the actions of one man..  It's nothing but the use of sensationalism based on ignorance, malice and fear mongering towards the male gender that these people use, "to distort the rule of law and legislation" that they put forward by their special interest groups

These are civil rights violations and are under mining this countries future for all people, including children's rights.

Just recently the BC Liberal Government interfered in a human rights case which does show that they are more interested in gender profiling for one gender, ["Feminist"], rather then using common sense and real laws based on justice and fairness.

The Government is violating section 15 and 28 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms for a select minority called radical feminist.

When we all see that Violence issues are not gender issues, they are social issues and when people start to see that then maybe violence issues will be addressed properly, and I find blaming all men for violence is just like throwing a match on gasoline to further more hate on the male gender, while everyone ignores women's violence. You can not have two-tear Justice systems based on sexism.

This is no different than the popular argument that men ruled history and are responsible for the domination of women since the beginning of time.  Once again, the men of our day are asked to feel the guilt of all history and pay the price.  No feminist would admit that the price is to let women use the same tactics they have so loudly denounced as oppressive for the purpose of writing the social policy that makes them winners in the gender war.  The laws say "men and women are equal in the laws, but in the real word being a male in today's society is being offered up in the golden militant platter as a crime. And if these Militant Feminist have children (boys) I can only imagine how they are getting treated as the type of actions they portray to society for being born the wrong gender.

It is hard to avoid the conclusion that this war is no different than the last one, and harder still to imagine how making the world a guilt-ridden, hostile environment for men will somehow result in a kinder, gentler masculinity.  Until we start caring about the violence done to men, and caring about men at all, our efforts to reduce violence against women will not succeed.

This mis-use of tax money on the use of criminal based propaganda for a desired goal makes a point of expressing many concerns for Canadian citizen's one half who happened to be male, for these types of Liberal feminist extremist reports, that beat up on the male gender are very dangerous to the family values that are hold very dear, when these people feel they can slander anyone because they are Militant feminists. 

So now why should my or your tax dollars have to fund these types of militant feminist, at Laval University, so they can show their extremist, sexist and bigoted hate, so they can keep right on promoting their male bashing reports, while forwarding this misandry they produced.

A prime example of a Slanderous Hate report is the one listed below.

School Success by Gender: A Catalyst for the Masculinist Discourse is one such report, that never should have been produced by using tax payers money, that is directed at the Male gender - based on sexist, bigoted hate and slander. I can state these people and the government will not be getting my tax dollars any more and they can go jump in the lake for all I care. Speak out about your tax dollars being wasted on their false disinformation and misleading projects supported not only by the Liberal government, but used to silence views they dislike. 

Canada has become a Nation where it not correct to be of the male gender and the way the radical feminist would have the public believe that all men are criminals. 

A another prime example sexism and a bigoted out look even from the courts is what has been quoted on what several judges in BC who believe that men's rights is a dirty word, which is a charter violation as the Supreme Court of Canada stated on the birth issue from.

The QUOTE'S FROM THE BC SUPREME COURT Judges in that case.

-- Madam Justice Mary Southin (British Columbia)

The legislature...has decreed that fathers have no rights in British Columbia

"The legislature no longer considers that marriage ... is a social institution of paramount or, ... any importance. ... The appellant is in no worse legal position than any other father."

"... The legislature has left no 'gap' in this question of a child's name and surname. It has decreed that fathers have no rights."

-- Madam Justice Mary Newbury, concurring:

"I acknowledge that the comprehensive plan adopted by the legislature ... will not work perfectly in every case. ... But there is good reason to believe [giving fathers an absolute right to be included in the registration] would cause far more harm than good and would be unreasonable in most cases where the problem arises."

MP BETTY HILTON, The MP who stood up against tyranny on the male gender. The Video of MP Betty Hinton speaking out in Parliament about SOW and their terrorist tactic's on male citizen's and even on women who speak out in Canada

Summery of what took place in the House of Commons

Status of Women Canada

Mrs. Betty Hinton (Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys, Canadian Alliance): 

Mr. Speaker, the minister responsible for Status of Women Canada is supporting the idea of a "hate watch group" to monitor men's and parents' organizations across Canada. This recommendation is found in the report commissioned by the minister called "School Success by Gender: A Catalyst for the Masculinist Discourse". Two well-known and respectable organizations in British Columbia are on that hate list. How can the minister justify spending public funds on an absurd list that promotes hatred against respected parents' organizations?

    Hon. Sheila Copps (Minister of Canadian Heritage, Lib.): 

Mr. Speaker, I think the work of Status of Women Canada is actually to discourage hate against any person on the basis of gender. I have to say that when I look at the literally thousands of women in Canada still working for 64¢ on a dollar earned by a man, the thousands of women in Canada working full time trying to raise a family on less than $20,000, and the fact that 7% of boards of directors across the country are women, I think we have a long way to go to achieve equality in this country.
I hope Status of Women Canada continues its good work.
Mrs. Betty Hinton (Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys, Canadian Alliance): 

Mr. Speaker, those are nice comments but they have nothing to do with the compiling of a hate list. The minister spent 75,000 precious taxpayer dollars on a report filled with hate and inflammatory language that does nothing to raise the status of women but everything to denigrate men, families and parent organization volunteers. We know Liberals have contempt for Canadians but never suspected they would subsidize groups to demonstrate that contempt. Why did the minister spend $75,000 on a project that is a poorly disguised attack on men and the family unit?

[Translation]

    Hon. Sheila Copps (Minister of Canadian Heritage, Lib.): 

Mr. Speaker, I find it troubling that the member is referring to work done by three professors at Université Laval. If she does not agree with recognized work done by universities on the issue of gender equality, that is her prerogative. However, I think the Government of Canada has a duty to ensure equality between men and women. Three professors from Université Laval have conducted a study; we should at least look at it

The Report - 

 School Success by Gender: A Catalyst for the Masculinist Discourse

The Status of Women and it's authors of the report School Success by Gender: A Catalyst for the Masculinist Discourse  Pierrette Bouchard; *Marie-Claude Proulx; *Isabelle Boily

THE FEDERAL LIBERAL GOVERNMENT'S MALE BASHING CAMPAIGN DESIGNED BY THE STATUS OF WOMEN AND IT RADICAL FEMINIST FRIENDS IN LAVAL UNIVERSITY

The Honourable Jean Augustine is the Secretary of State (Status of Women).

Status of Women Canada (SWC) is the federal government department which promotes gender equality, and the full participation of women in the economic, social, cultural and political life of the country. SWC focuses its work in three areas: improving women's economic autonomy and well-being, eliminating systemic violence against women and children, and advancing women's human rights. 

(SEE HIT LIST.) now removed off the federal Liberals website

A paper funded by the Canadian government publishes the names of American citizens whom it suggests are guilty of hate crimes. A Canadian federal agency called Status of Women urges that groups who advocate for fathers be investigated for criminal prosecution.

In fact, many of the so-called "hate groups" are not groups but individuals, who are simply criticizing the government. They advocate equal rights for parents in divorce cases. Under Canadian law, these citizens may be subject to arrest. And the government is urging that they be arrested: "We recommend that consideration be given to whether legal action can be taken under Section 319 of the Criminal Code," the report says. That statute subjects to imprisonment anyone "who, by communicating statements in a public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach."

If anything, though, it would appear to be the Canadian government that is inciting hatred against private Canadian and American citizens.

Betty Hinton, a member of the Canadian House of Commons, calls the report "a poorly disguised attack on men and families" and says it is filled with hate and inflammatory language which does nothing to raise the status of women but everything to denigrate men, families, and parent organizations.

The Canadian government has already resurrected archaic laws prohibiting criticism of government officials in order to arrest fathers, and fathers have been arrested for protesting outside government buildings. Special domestic violence courts in Canada can now remove fathers from their homes and seize their houses on unproven allegations.

So far as I know, none of the Americans on this list have been informed by the Canadian government that they are being targeted for possible criminal prosecution by the federal government.

Americans planning business or vacations in Canada should consider that their names may have been placed on government lists of "hate groups" without their knowledge and may therefore be arrested if they cross the border.

Stephen Baskerville and The news report

Dr. Baskerville teaches political science at Howard University in Washington, D.C. He earned his Ph.D. in political science from the London School of Economics. Visit his MND archive here. Visit his website here.

http://www.fcfnewsondemand.org/

Canadian Government Calls Fathers Advocacy Organizations "Hate" Groups  ( 2:00 ) Interview With Stephen Baskerville - 7/11/03 12:38:00 PM

 WASHINGTON, DC - FCF News Contributor, Stephen Baskerville, says that groups advocating for fathers are classified as "Hate" groups in Canada. The Canadian government could subject these people to imprisonment. Listen in Real Media Listen in MP3 Format (To download this file to your hard drive for later editing - right click on the link and choose 'Save As') A paper funded by the Canadian government publishes the names of American citizens whom it suggests are guilty of hate crimes. A Canadian federal agency called Status of Women urges that groups who advocate for fathers be investigated for criminal prosecution. In fact, many of the so-called "hate groups" are not groups but individuals, who are simply criticizing the government. They advocate equal rights for parents in divorce cases. Under Canadian law, these citizens may be subject to arrest. And the government is urging that they be arrested: "We recommend that consideration be given to whether legal action can be taken under Section 319 of the Criminal Code," the report says. That statute subjects to imprisonment anyone "who, by communicating statements in a public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach."

If anything, though, it would appear to be the Canadian government that is inciting hatred against private Canadian and American citizens. Betty Hinton, a member of the Canadian House of Commons, calls the report "a poorly disguised attack on men and families" and says it is filled with hate and inflammatory language which does nothing to raise the status of women but everything to denigrate men, families, and parent organizations. The Canadian government has already resurrected archaic laws prohibiting criticism of government officials in order to arrest fathers, and fathers have been arrested for protesting outside government buildings. Special domestic violence courts in Canada can now remove fathers from their homes and seize their houses on unproven allegations. So far as I know, none of the Americans on this list have been informed by the Canadian government that they are being targeted for possible criminal prosecution by the federal government. Americans planning business or vacations in Canada should consider that their names may have been placed on government lists of "hate groups" without their knowledge and may therefore be arrested if they cross the border. For FCF News on Demand, this is Stephen Baskerville.

www.fathers.ca 27 March 2005

 

Of interest:

Fathers Canada 4 Justice

Google

 

 

The Parent Protest Group Campaigning for Parents Rights protesting against the Wales and UK Family Court's for Justice and Equality.
Exposing the truth to fight Injustice in Family Law
Last modified: Saturday April 05, 2008
Copyright © 2006 Parents4protest Wales/Cymru
Send mail to contact P4p with questions or comments about this web site.